In certain circumstances, mutual assent between the contracting parties may be broken, thus invalidating the contract. Which of the following defects to mutual assent involves compelling a person to act by the use of force?
A. One of the parties is under duress.
B. One of the parties is under undue influence.
C. One of the parties is under menace.
D. One of the parties is committing fraud.

The author uses dialogue in this excerpt mainly

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

What happened in georgia as a result of the supreme court ruling in brown v. board of education? the sibley commission was formed all public schools were desegregated the southern christian leadership was formed the general assembly passed laws to keep schools segregated.