In Worchester versus Georgia 1832 the state of Georgia wanted to remove Cherokees from within its borders and Bien to annex Cherokee land how did the court rule a only the federal government have the authority to deal with the Cherokees and the Georgia laws dealing with them were unconstitutional be the Georgia laws in the keys for upheld as constitutional see the federal government and the state of Georgia both had authority to deal with Cherokees do you the state of Georgia did not have the authority to deal with Cherokees the true authority belong to the state of Alabama
In Worcester versus Georgia 1832 and wanted to remove Cherokees from within its borders and began to annex Cherokee land how did the court roll E only the federal government had the authority to deal with the Cherokees and the Georgia laws dealing with them more unconstitutional be the Georgia laws in the case were upheld as constitutional see the federal government in the state of Georgia both had authority to deal with Cherokees do you say to Georgia did not have the authority to deal with Cherokees the true authority belong to the state of Alabama.

In a sense we’ve come to our nation’s capital to cash a check. when the architects of our republic wrote the magnificent words of the constitution and the declaration of independence, they were signing a promissory note to which every american was to fall heir. this note was a promise that all men—yes, black men as well as white men—would be guaranteed the unalienable rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. it is obvious today that america has defaulted on this promissory note insofar as her citizens of color are concerned. instead of honoring this sacred obligation, america has given the negro people a bad check, a check that has come back marked “insufficient funds.” but we refuse to believe that the bank of justice is bankrupt. we refuse to believe that there are insufficient funds in the great vaults of opportunity of this nation. and so we’ve come to cash this check, a check that will give us upon demand the riches of freedom and security of justice. in this section of the speech, analyze martin luther king’s connection between a defaulted promissory note and the lack of freedom experienced by african americans. which option offers the best analysis? question 3 options: a.mlk creates this analogy to communicate that america has enough freedom for all, but it needs to live up to its promises. b. mlk makes the analogy that america has run out of freedom. not everyone deserves to have it. c.mlk communicates that america should equally distribute funds to all citizens. everyone deserves equal access to the government’s money. d.mlk demonstrates that america is improving in equality and should keep the forward momentum.

Which of the following is a sign of a weak economywhich of the following is a sign of a weak economy

Feathers wings and the hollow bones of birds are examples of