subject
Social Studies, 02.04.2020 18:37 ivanf30

The driver-owner of an automobile that was involved in an accident with a truck sued the driver of the truck in federal court based on diversity jurisdiction for personal injuries and property damages suffered by the driver-owner as a result of the accident. A judgment was entered based on a jury verdict that the truck driver was not at fault for the accident. Subsequently, the passenger in the automobile at the time of the accident, who was unrelated to the driver-owner of the automobile, sued the truck driver in the same federal court based on diversity for personal injuries suffered by the passenger as a result of the accident.
Can the truck driver successfully preclude the re-litigation of his fault in the accident?

Answers:

A: No, because the judgment in the prior case was based on a jury verdict.
B: No, because the passenger was not a party to the prior lawsuit.
C: Yes, because defensive use of issue preclusion is permitted.
D: Yes, because the issue of the truck driver's fault for the accident was litigated in the prior lawsuit.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 18:00
Which description best describes florida's legislative branch of government? a) this branch is divided into two houses and is responsible for creating state laws. b) this branch is responsible for collecting taxes and budgeting government expenses. c) this branch is made up of cabinets to carry out laws and is led by the governor. d) this branch is responsible for protecting citizens' rights and liberties and interpreting laws.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 23:30
If u can vote in an election for a governor representative without political or religious restriction, where do you most likely live? a.isreal b.jordan c.lebanon d.syria plz
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:00
What are three voluntary behaviors that is not controlled by results
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40
Ageneral requirement for informed consent is that no informed consent may include any exculpatory language. exculpatory language is that which waives or appears to waive any of the subject’s legal rights or releases or appears to release those conducting the research from liability for negligence. which of the following statements in a consent form is an example of exculpatory language? taking part in the research is voluntary, but if you choose to take part, you waive the right to legal redress for any research-related injuries.your participation in this research is voluntary. if you choose not to participate, or change your mind later, your decision will not affect your relationship with the researcher or your right to other services that you may be eligible for.in the event of any distress you may have related to this research, you will be given access to appropriate resources.the researcher may stop you from taking part in this research without your consent if you experience side effects that make your emotional condition worse. if you become too emotionally distressed during the research, you may have to drop out.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The driver-owner of an automobile that was involved in an accident with a truck sued the driver of t...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 22.10.2019 09:00