subject
Social Studies, 26.03.2020 03:28 batista68

The fact that the presence of an ally, regardless of his/her competence, reduces conformity indicates that:.
A. Informational social influence typically wins out over normative social influence in the long run.
B. It is exceedingly difficult to hold out against the pressure to conform without at least one supporter in the group.
C. Conformity does not occur for high-stakes decisions with important repercussions.
D. Men conform less in private than they do in public.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:00
Where is sub-saharan africa located?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:00
Which of the principles do you feel is more important for our our american society? respond in 3 sentences. (principals: popular sovereignty, republicanism, federalism, separation of powers, checks and balances, limited government, or individual rights)
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Ahusband who believed that his wife was having an affair with his brother hired an arsonist to burn down the brother's house. they planned for the husband to take his brother to a ballgame so that the arsonist would be able to set the house on fire without detection. after the husband and brother left for the ballgame, however, the arsonist decided to abandon the plan and immediately left town without doing anything further. when the husband returned from the ballgame with the brother, he saw the house still standing and blurted out what was supposed to have happened. the husband and the arsonist were arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit arson. at the arsonist's trial, his attorney argued that he was innocent of the conspiracy because he decided not to go ahead with the plan, and nothing criminal had in fact occurred.at common law, how should a jury find the arsonist? a not guilty of conspiracy, because going to a ballgame is not a criminal overt act.b not guilty of conspiracy, because the husband, not the arsonist, committed the overt act.c guilty, because the husband executed his part of the plan.d guilty, because the arsonist agreed to set the brother's house on fire.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 22:30
Ais a ruling by the court that no trial is necessary because there are no essential facts in dispute. a. default judgment b. long-arm statute c. federal question d. summary judgment
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The fact that the presence of an ally, regardless of his/her competence, reduces conformity indicate...
Questions
question
Arts, 19.10.2021 01:00