subject
Social Studies, 25.03.2020 21:31 Morehollie7229

A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be un-obtrusive, taking second place to the total environment. Modern architects, plagued by egoism, have violated this precept. They have let their strong personalities take over their work, producing buildings that are not functional for public use. Which one of the statements below follows logically from the statements in the passage?
A) Un-obtrusive architecture is both inviting and functional.
B) Modern architects who let their strong personalities take over their work produce buildings that are not un-obtrusive.
C) An architect with a strong personality cannot produce buildings that functional well for the public.
D) A work of architecture that takes second place to the environment functions well for public use.
E) A work of architecture cannot simultaneously express its architect’s personality and be functional for public use.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 02:30
The second reading at mass, is taken from which part in the bible? a) letters b) new testament c) old testament d) gospels
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
Amendment was the first government definition of a citizen. answer = fourteenth amendment
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 13:30
Identify why the western ports were important to the united states.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 22:20
What happened to the cities with factories powered by coal? provided a new job for people turned only the air black turned everything black provided everyone with electricity
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A work of architecture, if it is to be both inviting and functional for public use, must be un-obtru...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 06.04.2020 20:31
question
Mathematics, 06.04.2020 20:32