Jan's roommate, Thelma, is always bragging about how well she is doing in her classes, about how much her professors admire and respect her, and that she is destined to be a great criminal defense attorney. When Jan points out Thelma's poor writing skills, Thelma cries because Jan doesn't appreciate her immense talents. Jan and her friends get irritated with Thelma because she expects to be given special treatment by her professors and fellow students. If Thelma has a psychological disorder, it would most likely be personality disorder.

Zach's reaction to this scenario is: "that's not a good decision. she'll probably wind up needing one, if not several, of her friends to cover for her. how do you think that's going to make them feel? " which of kohlberg's levels of development does this response represent?

Prior to 1994, rwanda's ethnic population was composed of a. a tutsi minority and a hutu majority b. a hutu minority and a tutsi majority c. an even number of hutus and tutsis d. a rwandan majority with hutu and tutsi minorities select the best answer from the choices provided. a b c d

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?