With their research on the infant named Albert, Watson and Rayner demonstrated that:

a. emotions could be displaced to a stimuli other than those that had originally elicited
b. the emotions intelligence is only partially genetically
c. determined bodily structure
d. interacts with experience to produce personality

(A). Emotions could be displaced to a stimuli other than those that had originally elicited

Explanation:

John Watson and Rosalie Rayner conducted an experiment called the little Albert experiment where they monitored an infant's response to a stimuli and then tried to alter that response by introducing a different stimuli.

In the experiment, the infant (Albert) who wasn't initially scared of a furry white rat, later became scared because each time Albert touched the rat, a loud noise was made behind him.

So Albert came to associate the rat with the loud noise and learnt to fear the rat and other furry animals and objects.

This experiment showed that emotions and reactions can be induced by introducing a stimuli, different from what a person is used to.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

the answer to your question is,

d. when a child was born.

-mabel < 3