subject
Social Studies, 18.03.2020 17:38 madim1275

Xavier, 16, invites a group of his high school friends to swim in a neighbor's pool late at night while that neighbor is away. They climb the fence and jump in, playing wildly and loudly in the water. Just a few minutes later, the police arrive. How does adolescent brain development help explain Xavier's poor decision making?

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:30
What are the most populous and least areas of russia and why are some areas more heavily populated than others
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:00
Which principle do modern democracies share with ancient athens? a. all people deserve equal rights. b. there should be no taxation without representation. c. people should vote on all matters that concern them. d. people should have a voice in government.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:00
For questions 6-10, match the letter of the description that best matches the term. descriptions: a. to people reach their full potential b. refers to a persons drive to reach his or her full potential c. name the type of therapy developed by rogers d. being accepted by another just as you are, or accepting someone else just as they are e. the bottom of maslows hierarchy 6. need for food, water and oxygen 7. client centered therapy 8. self-actualization 9. the goal of the humanistic approach 10. unconditional positive regard
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Xavier, 16, invites a group of his high school friends to swim in a neighbor's pool late at night wh...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.08.2021 17:50
question
Chemistry, 16.08.2021 17:50
question
Mathematics, 16.08.2021 17:50
question
Chemistry, 16.08.2021 17:50
question
Mathematics, 16.08.2021 17:50
question
Social Studies, 16.08.2021 17:50
question
Mathematics, 16.08.2021 18:00