Yuri Androvich is a blue-eyed Russian, and his paintings sell for over $10,000. Peter Roganov is also a blue-eyed Russian, and he just finished art school. Thus, his paintings should sell for over $10,000, too.

A) Inductive, strong. B) Deductive, valid. C) Inductive, cogent. D) Deductive, invalid. E) Inductive, weak.

inductive weak ( E )

Explanation:

An inductive weak argument is an argument whereby the outcome of the argument is less likely to occur/happen when compared to the presumed condition on which the argument was made.

Yuri Androvich is a blue-eyed Russian and his paintings sell for $10000 is the basis/ presumed condition on which the argument that Peter Roganov also a blue eyed Russian and a fresh graduate from Art school should also sell his artwork for $10000. this condition is not feasible because other factors such as expertise and experience could be the main reason behind the sales of Yuri's artwork at $10000 which Peter lacks.

hence the argument is an inductive weak argument.

the correct answer is individualism and exchange. at this stage, children begin to question the rules, because they can see that there is more than one side to them. different individuals have different viewpoints. they won't be able to reach this stage because of ignorance, a lack of ethics or personal biases. that is because people with that characteristiscs are not able to distinguish what is good or what is bad and they can't pursue their individual interests.

whitch constitution would be inadequate as a basis for government today?

the answer would be a) it only allowed catholics to be in government.