How do the following main points for a speech about the achievements of Ida Wells-Barnett violate the guidelines presented in your textbook for organizing main points? I. As a teacher, Wells-Barnett spoke out against inferior school facilities for African-American children. II. As a journalist, Well-Barnett campaigned against lynching. III. In the early 20th century, Wells-Barnett expanded her activities. The main points should have been arranged in causal order. The main points don't each deal with a separate aspect of the topic. The main points don't divide the topic consistently. all of the above.

The main points should have been arranged in causal order and the main points don't divide the topic consistently.

Option: A and C

Explanation:

Main points for a speech about the achievements of Ida Wells-Barnett violate the guidelines presented in your textbook for organizing main points. Proper guidelines should be maintained and for that all the points should have been arranged in causal order and the main points don't divide the topic consistently.

According to the time of event or time occurrence achievement list would be prepared and point wise division should not split the consistency of the topic. If it is then the relevance would get disturbed.

answer; (b) ; /stronger bonds between the nations of africa

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.