While attempting to visit a friend in Boston, Enrique is struggling with his friend's directions. They go something like this: "Turn left at the ballpark, right at the movie theater, go around the mall, and make a left turn." The directions are almost meaningless because Enrique has never been to Boston before.
a. Enrique is experiencing retroactive interference.
b. Enrique is trying to process too much information at one time.
c. Enrique does not have a schema to attach the new information to.
d. Enrique is experiencing a recency effect.

c. Enrique does not have a schema to attach the new information to.

Explanation:

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

i’m   sure probably just geuss and see which one you can get right, i’m pretty sure it is the combination of goods and services