Cognitive theory contends that the choice to commit delinquent acts can be controlled by the threat of punishment; if people believe illegal behavior will result in severe sanctions, they will choose not to commit crimes.

a. True.
b. False.

False

Explanation:

Knowing that  performing an action will cause unfavorable consequence is sometimes not enough to hinder bad behaviour. Information-processing theory is one of the cognitive theories that are in function when one makes a decision to perform an action. In reality if the emotional aspect is quite strong and it overcomes the rational of recieving punishment. In short, if you want to commit a delinquent act, the consequence does not matter.

b. False

Explanation: cognitive theory tries to explain human behavior through understanding of the thought processes of individuals. The basic idea is that personal thoughts, beliefs, assumptions and attitudes impact who we become and has been used to explain mental processes—since they are influenced by both internal and external factors, which eventually bring about learning in an individual. However, cognitive theory does not contend that the threat of punishment helps control delinquent behaviour. This is because punishment does not necessarily cause an individual to demonstrate a desirable behavior since there are several other factors including thoughts and attitudes and needs etc. that play a role in why an undesirable behaviour is exhibited.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: