Which of the following opinions is the cartoonist most likely trying to express? Polls are beneficial because people have up to the moment information. Polls show trends, but they also reflect the most temporary changes. Polls are so easy children can conduct them. Polls only serve to supply people with unnecessary information.

Cartoonist most likely trying to express polls that show trends but they also reflect the most temporary changes.

Option: B

Explanation:

Cartoonist normally exaggerates the actual thing and use different models and symbols to draw the actual scenario. In political cartoon cartoonist overdo or overact to highlight the point. Polling system not only keep people up to the moment information but also show the trend of flow and reflect the temporary changes. Analyst related with cartoonist interprets the reasons behind that changes and again predict future trend and final result.

Cartoonist's act and work is easy to understand. At a glance anybody can understand the fact because of its good presentation with attractive symbology.  

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

its c i google it wish u luck