All of the following are employer practices unfair to labor under the National Labor Relations Act EXCEPT: a. Interference with the efforts of employees to form, join, or assist labor organizations or to engage in concerted activities for their mutual aid or protection. b. An employer's domination of a labor organization or contribution of financial or other support to it. c. Discrimination in the hiring of or the awarding of tenure to employees for reason of union affiliation. d. Discrimination in the payment of wages and benefits according to the skill and ability of the workers employed by the employer. e. Discrimination against employees for filing charges under the act or giving testimony under the act. f. Refusal to bargain collectively with the duly designated representative of the employees.

The lifeguard at the local beach record the tides each day the chart below shows the high and low tides over two days

Who established the peoples republic of china in 1949

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?