The MTO study examined the consequences of relocating poor families to low-poverty neighborhoods. Identify the outcomes observed and not observed among families who were relocated to low-poverty neighborhoods.

Observed outcomes: employment; educational attainment; health & happiness.

Not observed outcomes: The stories of the families involved.

Explanation:

Those who planned the Moving To Opportunity (MTO) in the 1990s focused on Social Isolation and believed it could be reduced; therefore their main interest lay in the observed outcomes as stated above.

In 2010 a socio-etnographic in-depth study took place that added an important  qualitative and social dimension: it examined for example the difference between helping families to leave poor neighbourhoods and helping families escape poverty or the difference between networks of survival and networks of mobility. These were not examined in the initial MTO experiment and can be thus considered as outcomes not observed.

In 1930 and 1931, Georgia faced a record drought. Families lived with no running water or electricity, and poor nutrition. Poverty was rampant. Poor, rural areas also faced illnesses compounded by these conditions. Rural healthcare was minimal, at best.

Explanation:

it is due to the halo effect as the impression of the boy created earlier.on the mind of the principle affected his decision

idk