what was the effect of the supreme court’s ruling in citizens united v. federal election commission?
a.
it removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts.
b.
it removed all limits on campaign contributions by interest groups.
c.
it prohibited corporations and businesses from contributing to political campaigns.
d.
it prohibited interest groups from contributing to individual candidates.

The answer is: A. It removed limitations on corporate funding of political broadcasts.

At that time, the limitation of corporate funding of political broadcast was created to reduce the influence of the private sectors in the election. The supreme court later on ruled that the limitation is a violation of human rights that protected under the free speech clause in the first amendment.

elizabeth loftus conducted a study to observe the reliability of eyewitnesses during the 1970s. their baseline was to define how accurate are the recollections of eyewitnesses.

her studies do not support the use of eyewitness. loftus mentions in her work that we are not required to recall some experiences, meaning that rarely an individual eyewitness testimony is trustworthy. a good example is presented in her work, where all individuals watched a video and were than asked "about how fast were the cars going when they hit/smash? ". the testimonies changed based on the word she used to make the question (hit or smash), proving the fragility.

well its is frequent rain

have a good day