Jacqueline was driving home from work when she approached a traffic jam that came to a standstill on a bridge. The traffic did not move, and she began to feel anxious that she could not escape the traffic or the bridge. Last week, she experienced something similar when she stood in a long line at the grocery store. She now has developed an extreme fear of leaving home to risk facing one of these "inescapable" situations. Jacqueline is MOST likely suffering from:

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

delete this messag epls it wont let me out this exit2

answer; proximity;