Social Studies, 21.02.2020 19:43 aaroncx4900

Explaining confidence. Here is an explanation from the Associated Press concerning one of its opinion polls. Explain briefly but clearly in what way this explanation is incorrect. For a poll of 1,600 adults, the variation due to sampling error is no more than three percentage points either way. The error margin is said to be valid at the 95 percent confidence level. This means that, if the same questions were repeated in 20 polls, the results of at least 19 surveys would be within three percentage points of the results of this survey.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: andybiersack154

The explanation in the question is wrong and the way it is incorrect is explained as follows

It is wrong to say that the next 200 polls will behave in the same manner and have the same result as in the poll case considered. On carrying out more experiments, what should be seen is that the 95% results comes from the infinite number of experiments held and not on the basis of a single considered experiment. Furthermore, it is improper to say that 19 out of 20 surveys would lie between 3 percentage points.Knowing that a single experiment has results of 95% confidence intervals does not mean that it would happen for all similar cases

Explanation:

Answer from: skylar7192

The mistake in the analysis is saying that 95% of other polls' outcomes would be similar to the outcome of this poll. The correct statement would be that the outcomes of other surveys will be close to the actual result and not the outcome of this particular survey. Therefore, it is not right to say 95% means exactly 19 out of 20.

Explanation:

Answer from: Quest

Who knows, do another question and send it to me

Answer from: Quest

explanation:

allergens: overstimulate the nerve system

neurotics: attack nerve cells

mutagens: damage or otherwise alter dna sequence

generators: cause defects during growth and development

carcinogens: cause unchecked cell growth

i hope you get the idea according to me these are the effects that happened.

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00

According to ohrp, a problem is an “unanticipated problem” when it meets which of the following criteria: unexpected, related or possibly related to the research, suggests that the research does not put the subjects or others at greater riskunexpected, related or possible related to the research, suggests the research puts subjects or others at greater riskunexpected, unrelated to the research but still occurring with a subject, suggests the research puts others at greater riskexpected, related or possible related to the research, suggests the research puts others at greater risk

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:20

How does the establishment clause limit government?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:30

Supreme court. jim, who is a bit eccentric, says that he is fed up with the way a certain employer in his town treats employees and that he is going to sue that employer in an effort to improve matters. jim also says that he is going to start his case at the appellate court level, skipping over all those "lesser" judges. jim says that those justices will surely hear him out and that he will also seek a jury. although he is not a lawyer, jim believes that the offenses of the employer are so severe that the justices will appreciate his attempt to make things better for the employees involved. will jim get a jury at the appellate court level?

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 04:00

What do turbans indicate about the wearer? a.the wearer’s social status the wearer’s social statusb.the wearer’s birthplacethe wearer’s birthplacec.the wearer’s marital statusthe wearer’s marital statusd.the wearer’s religious sect the wearer’s religious sect

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Explaining confidence. Here is an explanation from the Associated Press concerning one of its opinio...

Questions