In choosing sides concerning CEO duality, two schools of thought exist. Which of the following would be a consideration for the Unity of Command school of thought? Multiple Choice CEO duality results in improved leadership efficiency and effectiveness. CEO duality leads to confusion in the decision-making process. CEO duality decreases the responsiveness of the leadership to shareholder needs. CEO duality does not provide clear focus on objectives and operations.

CEO duality results in improved leadership efficiency and effectiveness

Explanation:

Unity of command school of thought holds the position that a subordinate reports/answers to only one supervisor, who in turn is responsible to only one supervisor, and in that order all the way up the organizational hierarchy regardless of whether the top management of the organization is led by a group of people. Unity of Command school of thought does not support CEO duality.

answer; strength of association;