Programs like Human Terrain Systems Program and the Minerva Initiative offer funding to anthropologists whose work can benefit defense planning. Many in anthropology see this as a problem for the discipline. What do they find problematic?

the "weaponizing of anthropology"

Explanation:

Programs like Human Terrain Systems Program and the Minerva Institute Initiative fall under controversial issues because some people find them problematic. Some say that these programs are "weaponizing anthropology" because they go against the "Code of Ethics" ("do no harm to those they study") being followed by anthropologists. This means that the information collected by the anthropologists will be used for military purposes against humans (which contradicts the Code of Ethics). This also provided the possibility that anthropology will be connected to war machines.

So, this explains the answer.

explanation:

actually, not all representation was acceptable based on this little piece of article, in 1776, the second continental congress issued the declaration of independence, stating their specific grievances with the british monarchy and why they were going to create a separate government. after the colonies separated from the british monarchy and formed the united states of america, they had to answer some crucial questions: 1) if not a monarchy, what type of government was the united states going to have? 2) what kind of government was going to protect the people without violating their individual liberties?

world war i had a devastating effect on german-americans and their cultural heritage. up until that point   german-americans, as a group, had been spared much of the discrimination, abuse, rejection, collective mistrust experienced by so many different racial and ethnic groups in the history of the united states. indeed, over the years, they had been viewed as a well integrated and esteemed part of american society. all of this change with the outbreak of war.