Dominic sues Gemalt, Inc. for negligence. At trial, Dominic testifies that he heard Francis, a manager at Gemalt, say that he thought Gemalt was acting carelessly. Dominic's testimony about Francis will most likely be: a. not admitted as evidence because it is hearsay. b. not admitted as evidence because it is not relevant to the issues. c. admitted as evidence because the jury is able to evaluate all evidence witnesses wish to present. d. admitted as evidence because it is the testimony of the plaintiff.

a. not admitted as evidence because it is hearsay.

Explanation:

Dominic's testimony of Francis conversation which was made out of court constitutes a hearsay evidence and hearsay evidences are inadmissible in the court of law. Hearsay or hearsay evidences are out-of-court statement made by a witness in court to prove  the truth of a case.  

i looked up you question and i found this on quizlet i hope this is one of your answer choices.

modern american cars are not available due to trade restrictions

my man just wants some puu

explanation: