The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to deter police misconduct. Critics, however, say the exclusionary rule has failed to achieve that purpose. Do you agree? Why?

I agree that the exclusionary rule has failed to deter police misconduct.

Explanation:

The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to prevent law enforcement officers from conducting searches or seizures which breaches the Fourth Amendment and provide amendment to defendants whom their rights have been infringed.

I agree with critics who believe that the rule has failed to achieve its aim. Even though the rule can turn a tedious case into an easy one through the exclusion of crucial pieces of evidence, when they were collated in an unreasonable search or seizure which violates the Fourth Amendment, its influence is limited to that particular case. When the evidence is eventually thrown out, the police officer who breached one's civil rights is unaffected and most times might not even be aware that what they did violated one's right. Hence, the police officer can violate another person because there is no penalty or repercussion for violating your constitutional right. Using the exclusionary rule does not prevent the police from going back out and violating someone else’s rights, therefore the rule fails to properly address the issue of misconduct by law enforcement officers and unreasonable searches.

despite recent progress in bangladesh in the areas of poverty and human development indicators such as literacy and life expectancy, inequalities in income and consumption rates have increased, with 32% of the population living below the poverty line.

bangladesh is one of the world’s most densely populated countries; the size of illinois, bangladesh has a population of 156 million people, half the population of the united states. despite recent progress out of poverty and increasing human development indicators such as literacy and life expectancy, inequalities in income and consumption rates have increased (undp 2005). 32% of the population lives below the national poverty line, most of whom are women and children. the prevalence of child (under 5) malnutrition is 33%, one of the highest in the world.

the disproportionate poverty faced by women and girls comes as a result of discrimination and exclusion within bangladeshi society, struggling to establish their rights and influence in decision-making processes. traditional practices such as dowries, child marriages and the relegation of being last to eat have created a demeaning and dangerous sociopolitical context for girls and women. (world vision, 2014)

whitch constitution would be inadequate as a basis for government today?

the answer would be a) it only allowed catholics to be in government.