can be defined as a broad and unpredictable spectrum of military, paramilitary, and information operations, conducted by nations, organizations, or individuals or by indigenous or surrogate forces under their control, specifically targeting weaknesses and vulnerabilities within an enemy government or armed force.

Asymmetric threat

Explanation:

The asymmetric threat is a form of warfare threat that has become common to the world these days. The term asymmetric refers to not identical or absence of symmetry.

The asymmetric threat is the war that is fought between the military forces that differ from each other in terms of their strategies, tactics, etc. The war is usually fought between professional army and unlawful combatants. In such a type of war, the military usually targets the weaknesses of the enemy army.

An example of 'asymmetric threat or warfare' is the American Revolution War.

So, the correct answer is asymmetric threats.

The correct answer is Asymmetric Threat

Asymmetric Threat is not only the war of the weak against the strong: it is the introduction of an element of rupture, technological, strategic or tactical, an element that changes the preconceived idea; it is the use of an opponent's weak point.

Therefore, there is no asymmetrical armed conflict just because of the inequality between the opponents, but when the adversaries adopt different forms of combat in their conception and development. In operational terms, then, the asymmetry (understood as unbalance) “derives from a force employing new capabilities, which the opponent does not perceive, understand or expect: conventional capabilities that surpass those of the opponent or that represent new methods of attack and defense ”.

It is really light infantry warfare, which can move farther and faster over land than the enemy, which has a complete tactical repertoire (not just keeping in touch and requesting fire support), which can fight with its own weapons (as opposed to relying on support weapons) and to maintain minimal logistical support.

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.  

answer; /// working class;