Which of the following is NOT a way a defendant can avoid liability under the 1933 act?a. The statement or omission was not material. b. The plaintiff and the defendant conspired to save the company. c. The plaintiff knew about the misrepresentation at the time of purchasing the stock. d. The defendant exercised due diligence in preparing the registration and reasonably believed at the time that the statements were true and there were no omissions of material facts.

1. what was the premise behind the recording industry association of america’s lawsuit against napster? 2. based on your knowledge of how napster worked, if you downloaded a copy of a song from a friend’s hard drive using napster, would you be infringing on the musician’s or record company’s copyright? 3. describe the scope of the digital millennium copyright act and what or whom it protects. 4. what was the link between the digital millennium copyright act and the napster legal proceedings? 5. what are the legal implications of napster’s online music-sharing service?