Match the following1. imperialism2. racism3. Social Darwinism4. Boer 5. paternalism6. Emilio Aguinaldo 7. Menelik II8. Queen Liliuokalania. theory that those who are fittest for survival enjoy wealth and success and are superior to others b. Dutch settlers in South Africa c. seizure of a country or territory by a stronger country d. Filipino nationalist leader who fought against the US colonization of the Philippine Islands e. Ethiopian leader who succeeded in resisting European colonization f. belief that one race is superior to others g. policy of governing people in a parental way by providing for their needs but not giving them rights h. protectorate i. Hawaiian ruler who tried to restore the political power of Hawaiians j. indirect rule

The following are sumerian inventions, except

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

According to ohrp, a problem is an “unanticipated problem” when it meets which of the following criteria: unexpected, related or possibly related to the research, suggests that the research does not put the subjects or others at greater riskunexpected, related or possible related to the research, suggests the research puts subjects or others at greater riskunexpected, unrelated to the research but still occurring with a subject, suggests the research puts others at greater riskexpected, related or possible related to the research, suggests the research puts others at greater risk