What are "sections?" Group of answer choices Regions of the country. The different political parties. Class divisions. Slave states or free states.

Statements 1,3 and 4

Explanation:

Firstly what is a section, a section is a part of an entity. An example of a entity is q group of children between the age of 10-15.

Based on the above example, we have aj entity and an entity is established based on the factors binding such entity or criteria that makes up an entity.

But what is considered a section, a section can't exist without an entity, it is from an entity that we create a section.

From the above example, a section such as the group of female children from the group of children between the ages 10-15, I.e females between the age of 10-15 is a section from the group of children between the age of 10-15. From here you can understand what a section means.

Relating to the options above,

Regions from a country, here the country is an entity ,but country consist or regions so this statement t is true as we can categories section as region and entity as the country.

The second statement explains a different political party. This is different from another entity ,it means there is another entity that is different from the political party, so an entity and section relationship is not established based on that word different.

The third statement explains an entity and section relationship, so it the fourth.

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.  

answer; /// the above statement is (true );