Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) members normally evaluate both and factors to award a contract when selection the Best Value for the government.

The answers for the blank spaces are: cost, and price: Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) members normally evaluate both cost and price factors.

Explanation:

Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) members make assessments with legal support, logistics, and technical expertise in order to fully comprehend offers and evaluate cost and price factors to award a contract when managing tradeoffs and selecting the best value for the government.

they evaluate both "RELEVANT AND RESPONSIVE" factors.

Explanation: Source selection evaluation board, are those that helps organization to select contract proposal and the best proposal that meets the job requirements. They identify the job requirements and communicate those requirements.

They evaluate the relevant factor, by identifying the proposal that meets the job requirements, and the ones that is properly explained in accordance to companies ideology.

They evaluate the responsive factor by knowing the proposal that will be most acceptable by the company if communicated. In evaluation of the responsive factor, they consider the company's targeted aim, beyond the job requirements, to consider the best proposal to be accepted and appreciated, when communicated to the company.

manifest functions are the recognized and intended consequences of any social pattern, while latent functions are those unrecognized and unintended consequences. to analyze the manifest functions of any social institution, we have to study its contribution to the continuation of a group, community, or society.