Current-day christians use violence to spread their right-to-life message. these christians, often referred to as the religious right, are well known for violent demonstrations against planned parenthood and other abortion clinics. doctors and other personnel are threatened with death, clinics have been bombed, there have even been cases of doctors being murdered.

Argument

Conclusion: "Current-day Christians use violence to spread their right-to-life message."

Premise: "These Christians, often referred to as the religious right, are well known for violent demonstrations against Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics".

Premise: "Doctors and other personnel are threatened with death, clinics have been bombed, there have even been cases of doctors being murdered".

Explanation:

This statement is false but the argument is valid. It concluded through premises(two) in the example above which serve as evidence for the final conclusion. We notice that the conclusion comes first before the premises in the example as opposed to the normal arrangement of premise before conclusion. This shows clearly that conclusion may come before a premise in an argument.

economic

well considering i can't see the graph, it's probably prices