While jill was playing soccer, she grew thirsty. midway through her game she couldn't run anymore, and she wanted to stop playing. according to this situation, which theory of motivation could account for jill wanting to stop playing and get a drink of water?

Drive reduction theory.

Explanation:

According to the Drive reduction theory of motivation, when an individual is experiencing a need of psychological or physiological origin, is followed by a drive (motivation) to satisfy, or in other words, reduce this need. If the drive is not satisfied, it becomes more intensive with time up to the point that an individual will do everything to satisfy the drive.

Here, Jill experienced the drive to satisfy (reduce) her physiological need to drink water while playing. Meanwhile, it was not too strong. She kept playing but the need to satisfy her thirst became so strong (intensified) that she decided to stop playing.

the first settlements began along the huang river because of the importance of the huang river in the beginning of china. it goes back to the story, “the tale of emperor yu”, which references the tale of the great flood, which was caused by the huang river and was believed to create and influence china’s making.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )