According to erikson, an emotional and psychological closeness thatis based on the ability to trust, share, and care, while still maintainingone's sense of self, is called . bondingb. intimacyc. attachmentd. attraction

Intimacy

Explanation: According to Erikson's eight stages of psychosocial development which describes sequential personality development in an individual from infancy to adulthood.

Intimacy and Isolation marks the sixth stage of Erikson's psychosocial theory which occurs between age 18-25. It centers on moulding affectionate and close relationships with other people especially those who aren't part of our family. The ability to develop a sense of trust, commitment and affection while also sharing one's thought and feelings with others will lead to intimacy and foster the virtue of love and compassion. Inability to make commitment, share and trust others results in isolation

which could yield despondency.

intimacy

Explanation:

Hello! According to Erikson, intimacy is formed in love relationships. It is when you manage to be close to others with a feeling of knowing who you are and without fear of “losing” yourself. If people cannot form these intimate relationships, a feeling of unwanted isolation may arise, awakening feelings of darkness and anguish.

Thanks for your question .

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )