On the first day of the month, thomas and moore orally agreed that thomas was to deliver to moore’s place of business a case of fruit on each monday of the current month. moore was to pay the us $100 price on the first of the following month. on the 15th of the month, the agreement should be classified as unexecuted because the agreement was
a. oral.
b. executory.
c. cancelable at any time.
d. executed.

Read this passage from the u.s. constitution: the congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the congress.3 based on the passage, which statement is true? a. the constitution cannot be changed, but congress and the states can call for a new constitution to be written. b. the process of changing the constitution requires broad support from both congress and the states. c. the constitution can be changed through a process that requires a simply majority vote in congress. d. changing the constitution is a difficult process that only the president can carry out

The author uses dialogue in this excerpt mainly

Charles schenck was a u.s. citizen and private in the army. while in military training during world war i, schenck printed and passed out leaflets explaining why he was against the draft (required military service). he was charged with violating the espionage act of 1917, a federal law outlawing any action interfering with military operations. schenck believed the espionage act violated his right to free speech. in which court would this case ultimately be decided, and why? a state criminal court, because schenck was accused of violating a criminal law a military tribunal, because the matter involved members of the military a county civil court, because it involved violation of a civil liberty the u.s. supreme court, because schenck challenged whether the law was constitutional