On the existentialist view, to understand what a human being is it is not enough to know all the truths that natural science—including the science of psychology—could tell us.

The correct answer for: On the existentialist view, to understand what a human being is it is not enough to know all the truths that natural science—including the science of psychology—could tell us. Is that humans can't be understood and explained in any of them.

Explanation:

The existentialist point of view does not deny the explanations all the sciences and disciplines have about human beings. But it says that they are not enough to provide a total explanation and description of them. In other words that even though they describe phenomenons with objective measurements, they don't have the elements required to make a full explanation of human beings.

abolish

do away with

unanimous

in complete agreement

secede

separate; break free

inauguration

starting a new position with a formal ceremony.

cooperationist

people who wanted the north to cooperate with the south

surrender

to give up

volunteer

perform a service for free

draft

involuntary service in military

retreat

withdraw; move away from enemy

advisor

expert who gives advice

explanation:

answer; gender,race,age,/// (d) all of these;