subject
Social Studies, 08.01.2020 05:31 korban23

You just ordered a pizza from your favorite restaurant and can’t wait for it to get here. as time passes, everything you hear sounds like a car driving by. what accounts for your "heightened" sense of hearing?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:40
Acriterion for waiving informed consent is that, when appropriate, subjects are provided additional pertinent information after the study. in which of the following studies would it not be appropriate to provide subjects with information about missing elements of consent: a study in which researchers told students that they would be given a quiz after reading some study materials when the researchers did not intend to use a quiz, but were attempting to focus subjects’ attention on the material.a study in which subjects were told that they performed in the third quartile on an anagram task when in reality students were randomly assigned scores that were not related to their actual performance.a study in which subjects were assigned to study activities based on an undesirable or unflattering physical characteristic as assessed by members of the research team.a study involving decision-making games in which subjects were led to believe that they were interacting with another student in another room, but were actually interacting with a computer programmed to provide consistent responses to all subjects.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:50
4. discuss three characteristics of postmodern society? how does postmodern society differ in these characteristics than pre-industrial or modern societies?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:50
Federal courts have jurisdiction when a case involves what?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
You just ordered a pizza from your favorite restaurant and can’t wait for it to get here. as time pa...
Questions
question
Business, 29.01.2020 02:03
question
Social Studies, 29.01.2020 02:04
question
Mathematics, 29.01.2020 02:04