subject
Social Studies, 04.01.2020 02:31 brilove47

Jack and jane are coworkers. they like each other and decide to date. then they break up. jack now has trouble working around jane. this is: a. quid pro quo sexual harassment b. not sexual harassment under title vii c. hostile environment sexual harassment d. not a clear enough case to determine sexual harassment

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
The areas with the highest population density in europe are most likely to be
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:00
How do most people in israel and its neighbors differ from political extremists such as terrorists
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 06:00
Which of the following are offices under the jurisdiction of the executive office
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Jack and jane are coworkers. they like each other and decide to date. then they break up. jack now h...
Questions