An american traveling abroad observes locals eating chocolate-covered crickets. while she does not partake in this "treat" herself, she does not judge the practice. she is exhibiting:

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

The word that means" relating to soldiers and war"

How can the judiciary balance individual rights with the common good?