In a survey of 10 film historians, half voted for nosferatu as the greatest vampire film ever made, and the other half voted for dracula. however, when asked which lead vampire character they considered more charismatic, all of the film critics chose dracula over nosferatu.
based on the information above, it must be true that for some film critics, their feelings about the charisma of the lead character (points : 1)
is the least important factor they consider when comparing two filmsis the most important factor they consider when comparing two filmsis not the most important factor they consider when comparing two filmsis the only factor they consider when comparing two film

is not the most important factor they consider when comparing two films

Explanation:

The first option is wrong logically in that, while the charisma of the lead character is not the most important factor considered, it is definitely not stated as the least as other factors are also considered.

The second option is also wrong in that if the charisma of the lead character is the most important factor considered, more than 5 out of the 10 critics would have also voted Dracula as the greatest vampire movie ever made.

The last option is wrong  in that if the charisma of the lead character is the most important factor considered, all 10 critics would have also voted Dracula as the greatest vampire movie ever made.

apart from being against desegregation, governor of georgia eugene talmadge opposed as well to the work progress administration, an ambitious program of the "new deal" created by president franklin d. roosevelt to overcome the great depression after world war i. talmadge disagreed with welfare spending, job training and organized labor. according to his ideas, he thought the government was spending too much money on this, and he wasn't willing to accept a wage higher than georgia's lower average wage. besides, talmadge strongly opposed to the "new deal" as he thought it had communist ideas.

an informal structure in a bureaucracy would be something like so-called "office politics". where there's a formal structure set up for the organization, but then an informal subculture as well that has a way of organizing the bureaucracy further. this can be positive because it sets up an added degree of organization, albeit informal, within the bureaucracy.