subject
Social Studies, 24.12.2019 05:31 20stirltrer

Tom has left his home and is attending college in a city that is far away from home where he does not know anybody. according to the mere exposure effect, tom will be most likely to make friends with . bill, his roommate; 2. john, who lives across campus; 3. michael who lives in the same dorm but 2 floors below; 4. stuart who lives 10 miles away in an off-campus apartment.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:30
Which best expresses the radical republican philosophy of reconstruction? a. the confederate states were conquered territories that should be ruled by military governors. b. the southern states actually never left the union. c. if ten percent of the voters of a state that had seceded took an oath of allegiance to the union, then it should be readmitted as a state.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:20
Mankiw attributes – chapter 1 and his 10 principles – differences in living standards within a countryover time and across countries at a moment in time to: a. the presence or absence of inflation and unemployment.b. the allocation of resources between private markets and the public sector.c. those that have dealt successfully with the efficiency v. equality tradeoff and those that haven’t.d. differences in productivity.e. ones that think at the margin and respond to incentives and those that don’t.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:30
As well as a constitutional human right to associate with whomever you , there should be a corresponding right to disassociate if you .” - lester maddox which statement about lester maddox is best supported by information from the quotation? question 1 options: lester maddox was a segregationist. lester maddox enforced the constitution. lester maddox believed in the freedom to associate. lester maddox supported the 1964 civil rights act.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50
Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Tom has left his home and is attending college in a city that is far away from home where he does no...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 03:30
question
Spanish, 16.12.2020 03:30
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 03:30
question
Mathematics, 16.12.2020 03:30