Identify the type of evidence illustrated in the following argument: i don't believe that the internet can ever be a reliable source for students to use in their work, at least as long as it remains unregulated as it is now. with so many different web sites out there and no way to verify the validity of the information on them, the internet is just too hit and miss to be of any use. it's just like a bad baseball player; if you only hit one ball out of ten, it doesn't matter if the one you hit is a homerun - the major leagues don't want you.

In this case the general argument of the text is based in a reason that is composed by a claim, and it is supported by an example of a baseball player.

Explanation:

In this case the general argument of the text is based in a reason that is composed by a claim, and it is supported by an example of a baseball player. The author explains about the way in which he/she disagrees with the use of the internet as a reliable source for research because it is an unregulated mean of communication.

Nevertheless, this is a weak inductive argument that leads the author to the conclusion because it is not based in specific fact or data, it is merely based in an opinion that has some probability, and uses an example that could not be related to the topic itself at all.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: