Researchers continue to explore the emotional and physical repercussions of social rejection. in one study, participants exposed to rejection reported a significant reduction in hurt feelings after taking daily doses of acetaminophen, a painkiller used to reduce physical pain. what does this tell you about the body's response to social rejection?

That social rejection results in pain and suffering

Explanation:

When you're rejected by a person you care about and for any reason, it was necessary to break up with him/her, your body answer trough the feeling of pain. This happens because some areas of the brain are activated when you remember the moments you shared with that person (or group of person), and the idea that you can't stay with that person, or with the group, makes your brain understand that is painful, and your body answers with the same feeling.

The body’s systems that respond to physical pain are also involved in responding to psychological pain

Explanation:

This research supports the theory that there is an overlap between the body’s response to psychological and physical pain.

answer; john stuart mill's principle of utility is your answer; /// good luck

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )