What criteria might a judge who abides by a philosophy of judicial restraint use to decide a case?

The judge would consider both the intent of the Framers who wrote the part of the Constitution in question and previous court decisions on the topic.

Explanation:

When laws are framed, it is often misinterpreted and this allows for arguments and debates and what is the actual intent behind such a law when it was created a long time ago. It has to be examined from various perspectives. There are two methods in order to analyze the purpose behind such a creation of law.  

Firstly, judicial restraint promotes strict and narrow interpretation of the law whereas the second one is the judicial activism. A law and its suitability can be analyzed depending upon the political and personal point of view.

the vibration from the sound waves messed with the glass and it shattered.

hope this .

the answer is "meiosis ii in the mother".

the procedure of meiosis includes two divisions of the hereditary material. the main division is known as the decrease division – or meiosis i – on the grounds that it lessens the quantity of chromosomes from 46 chromosomes or 2n to 23 chromosomes or (n depicts a solitary chromosome set). in people, the decrease division results in two sperm cells each with 23 chromosomes or an egg cell with 23 chromosomes and one disposed of polar body. the second division – or meiosis ii – is called equational division. the two sperm cells split again creating four sperm cells, each with 23 or n chromosomes. in oogenesis, the egg cell and polar body partition to shape the ovum and two extra polar bodies. along these lines, the posterity are guaranteed to get one portion of the chromosomes from the mother and one half from the dad.