Upon revisiting his initial ideas, a researcher determines that the evidence supports a different perspective. what should he do next? check all that apply.

a.) move ahead by creating an outline of his research assignment
b.) consider whether he ought to go back to find more evidence
c.) think about whether he needs to change his perspective
d.) begin writing a well-supported argument
e.) continue to develop his argument despite the evidence

(i thought it was a, b,c, d but that is wrong).

D.) Begin writing a well-supported argument

E.) Continue to develop his argument despite the evidence

Explanation:

While writing a research paper, a researcher must have a well established hypothesis. A paper is only acceptable if it has some rebuttals for the authenticity of it.

Therefore if a researcher finds some evidence that goes against the initial perspective, he should go on about building the perspective and focus on how he support his further arguments.

good question. i'll be looking into that. (this is a joke sir)