Jo is a courier delivering parcels throughout the metropolitan area. although she considers herself law abiding, she often breaks the speed limit while making her deliveries. which of the following statements does not reflect a likely response to the conflict between her attitude and her behavior? "this speeding is irresponsible. from now on i am observing the speed limits." "it's wrong to break even minor laws, but i'll probably keep speeding anyway." "i've got to drive fast sometimes, otherwise i will not make all my deliveries and i'll lose clients." "it's not a problem that i speed a little bit; it's not much over the limit, and everyone else speeds some." "the speed limits are just too low around here; anyone driving at a reasonable speed will break them."

What are the functions of wal-mart? are they the same or different from the functions of wal-mart in our individual lives? how do the two type of functions connect? does wal-mart have both manifest and latent functions? what are they? are there any dysfunctions of wal-mart for society? if so, what are they? how might these dysfunctions serve as incentives or catalysts for social change? conflict questions: does wal-mart affect every group in society in the same way? if not, what are the differences? how does wal-mart perpetuate the inequalities (of gender, race, class, religion, age, sexual orientation, etc.) in our society? how does wal-mart contribute to conflict between unequal groups in our society? how might wal-mart contribute to social change or the amelioration of inequalities in society? interactionist questions: what kind of symbolic world are you likely to encounter inside a wal-mart store, and how does that affect the shopper’s experience? how does wal-mart influence our interpersonal interactions? how do interpersonal interactions shape the wal-mart experience for shoppers? for workers? how does wal-mart contribute to our socially constructed reality?