"…our experiment found that people who trim the fat from their steaks were more likely to be atheists than those who ate the fat that god had provided for them. it’s possible that there’s a real correlation between cutting the fat from meat and being an atheist, vieland said, but that doesn’t mean that it’s a causal one." why can they not conclude that this is a causal relationship?

Highlight ideas in this passage that show why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution. if it were possible to consolidate the states, and preserve the features of a free government . . [w]ealth, offices, and the benefits of government would collect in the center: and the extreme states . . become much less important. . i still believe a complete federal bill of rights to be very practicable. which reasons below explain why the anti-federalists objected to the constitution? check all that apply power would be too centralized. a bill of rights was included. states would become less powerful. a bill of rights was not included. states would become more powerful.