Utilitarianism obviously looks at the consequences of an action to determine whether that action is the one to perform. how do the main versions of utilitarianism that we considered differ from kant's style of ethics or what is sometimes classified as deontogical ethics?

The most common description of utilitarianism concerns the welfare of sentient beings, those who are capable of pain and pleasure, in some cases even nonhumans. This description is why, in modern times, utilitarianism has been used in discussions about the suffering of nonhuman animals and ethical aspects involved in the production of food-producing animals.

According to Kant, the maximization of the good for those involved, the basic premise of utilitarianism with regard to moral action in society, is irrelevant from the point of view of those individuals concerned with the maximization of the good, or the positive outcome of their actions. actions, only for themselves, without caring about other people.

Deontological Ethics is a treatise on duties and morals. It is a theory about the choices of individuals, which is morally necessary and serves to guide what really should be done.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: