subject
Social Studies, 06.12.2019 20:31 jaimevalenzuela60

The idea of the brain as an information processor—a machine manipulating blips of energy according to fathomable rules— has come to dominate neuroscience. however, one enemy of the brain-as-computer metaphor is john r. searle, a philosopher who argues that since computers simply follow algorithms, they cannot deal with important aspects of human thought such as meaning and content. computers are syntactic, rather than semantic, creatures. people, on the other hand, understand meaning because they have something searle obscurely calls the causal powers of the brain. yet how would a brain work if not by reducing what it learns about the world to information—some kind of code that can be transmitted from neuron to neuron? what else could meaning and content be? if the code can be cracked, a computer should be able to simulate it, at least in principle. but even if a computer could simulate the workings of the mind, searle would claim that the machine would not really be thinking; it would just be acting as if it were. his argument proceeds thus: if a computer were used to simulate a stomach, with the stomach’s churnings faithfully reproduced on a video screen, the machine would not be digesting real food. it would just be blindly manipulating the symbols that generate the visual display. suppose, though, that a stomach were simulated using plastic tubes, a motor to do the churning, a supply of digestive juices, and a timing mechanism. if food went in one end of the device, what came out the other end would surely be digested food. brains, unlike stomachs, are information processors, and if one information processor were made to simulate another information processor, it is hard to see how one and not the other could be said to think. simulated thoughts and real thoughts are made of the same element: information. the representations of the world that humans carry around in their heads are already simulations. to accept searle's argument, one would have to deny the most fundamental notion in psychology and neuroscience: that brains work by processing information.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:20
Using mr smith and his id, identify two potential internal validity threats that might affect the a—b design. tell me how that threat might impact conclusions in the a—b design. note #1: you cannot use maturation (since i already did that one for note #2: there are some mr smith id threats that won’t have much impact in a single case design.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 03:00
What are the roles of students against women violence? explain
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:50
Much of the ill will between armenians and the azeri people of azerbaijan arises because
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 21:00
When it spends money on education, a government is trying to find a way to meet a social need. encourage immediate economic growth. meet a social need and improve the economy. find a way to spend budget surpluses.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
The idea of the brain as an information processor—a machine manipulating blips of energy according t...
Questions
question
English, 28.06.2021 22:50