Reasons for acquiring hostages include publicity, use as a bargaining chip while executing other crimes, the forcing of political concessions, and ransom
a) true
b) false

A) True

Explanation:

A terrorist organization can use kidnapping as a method to acquire more publicity.

Politically-oriented criminals also use kidnapping for political gain: for example, the IRA kidnapped a lot of people who they considered to be enemies of the Irish State.

Criminal organizations who run ilicit businesses for profit kidnap people as well, but their only motiviation is the ransom families pay for their kindapped loved ones.

The correct answer is A, as the statement is true. Reasons for acquiring hostages include publicity, use as a bargaining chip while executing other crimes, the forcing of political concessions, and ransom .

Explanation:

Criminals who take hostages in the midst of their crimes do so with a strategic objective. The hostages, according to their perspective, serve as a protection against any armed police eruption, as this could endanger the lives of those innocent people. In addition, hostages are used as currency to obtain certain benefits, for example, the exchange of hostages in exchange for a safe-conduct or other benefits.

In short, hostages are used for the criminals' own benefit, in order to obtain better negotiating conditions or an escape without being obstructed by the police.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

given all the practice it takes to become proficient at writing up ncoer's, , awards, and conselings as well as learning how to become a well rounded   leader , and managing different types of people