Kurt is 52 years old and has worked for a company covered by the age discrimination in employment act (adea) of 1967. he wants to bring a claim of age discrimination against his employer because he was replaced by a younger, lower-paid worker. to make out a prima facie case of age discrimination, kurt does not have to establish that he

was replaced by someone who was below the age of 40

Explanation:

Kurt does not need to establish that was replaced by someone who was below the age of 40 because The legal retirement age in united states is 65.   Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967  determined that as long as the workers haven't reached the retirement age, any mistreatment to older workers without any proof is illegal under the law.

All Kurt needs to do to make the case was to proof that The company does not provide him with any document of performance review that indicate he fail to meet the company's standard/.

well this isn't a question but if you are asking if it is true or false it is, true.