Ramon and edith have been married for 60 years and, when a local news station interviews them on their anniversary, they both say that their relationship keeps getting better and better, every year. what does longitudinal research on marital relationships say about how marital relationships change over time?
a. what matters is what they believe and if they believe their relationship is getting better, it must be getting better.
b. when a marriage has lasted as long as theirs has, it is almost certainly getting better over time.
c. in general, people in very long-term relationships will say they are getting better even if they are getting worse.
d. while people may say their relationship is getting better, research indicates that their actual ratings of the relationship will either stay the same or get worse.

Longitudinal research on marital relationships says Ramon and Edith's relationship will either stay the same or get worse.

Option D

Explanation:

Ramon and Edith have been married for 60 years and when a local station interviews them on their anniversary, they both say that their relationship keeps getting better and better, every year.

The longitudinal research on marital relationships says that While people may say their relationship is getting better, research indicates that their actual ratings of the relationship will either stay the same or get worse.

Even if the condition of married coupled relation are bad they would not accept it and further say lies about their status. So the following research shows the following reason in married couples.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation:

well considering i can't see the graph, it's probably prices