Social Studies, 21.11.2019 05:31 KillerSteamcar

Which best describes a historical interpretation?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: saderussell2003

The option that best describes a historical interpretation is C. An explanation for why a past event happened.

Explanation:

Historical interpretation involves evaluating what happened about some event or issue in the past and providing an explanation that involves analysis and description. Historians typically use either primary or firsthand sources or secondhand sources that give more context or details about an event. Historians are often interested in understanding the sequence of events in some process or historical outcome and determining the effects through time.

Answer from: Quest

Ithink the answers is c i hope it my friend message me if i’m wrong and i’ll change my answer and fix it for you

Answer from: Quest

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write

explanation:

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:00

Which entity owns most if the television stations, radio stations, and newspapers in the united states

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 16:00

Based on the text why did another christian church appeal to european princes?

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:50

The technique of getting a commitment from a potential customer and then changing the terms of the agreement is best described as low-balling. cognitive dissonance. reciprocal concession. the foot-in-the-door technique. a half-dozen high school students are going to a concert. chantal wants to wear a new colorful outfit that she just received as a gift, but she assumes that her five friends will all be wearing nothing but black leather. chantal decides to do likewise, and leaves her colorful outfit in the closet. chantal’s behavior is an example of conformity. resistance. reciprocation wariness. idiosyncrasy credits.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:10

What was the name of the theory that said that if one country in a region fell to communism, others would surely follow? 1) domino theory 2) arms race 3) brinkmanship 4) containment theory