Social Studies, 19.11.2019 23:31 cw1242605

In one paragraph each, answer the following two questions.

1.) do you feel that paul feyerabend’s belief falls more into a modernism or postmodernism method of thinking? support your opinion with a reason.

2.) after identifying which method the theory relates better to, use the example of feyerabend to discuss why you think philosophy and science (and, philosophers and scientists) have theories and ideas that blend into one another. how are these two disciplines related?

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 10:50

Alimitation on the president’s power to appoint ambassadors is that

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:50

During jefferson's administration, which of the following represented his tenure? a) he believed the power of his gov depended upon his popularity b) jefferson thought that the strength of his government depended its use if force c) she refused to add territory to the u.s without approval of the states. d) jefferson though of “hands off” approach to the states and less power in the cen. gov. would benefit the nation

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:30

“a monarchy is indeed the most powerful of any… but then there is imminent danger of his employing that strength to improvident or oppressive purposes.”—william blackstone, commentaries on the laws of england which of the following documents addressed blackstone’s concern in this quote? the magna carta, because it limited the power of the king. common sense, because it encouraged american colonists to declare independence. the mayflower compact, because it created a government and the first written laws for plymouth settlers. the english bill of rights, because it later influenced the u.s. bill of rights.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:50

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

In one paragraph each, answer the following two questions.

1.) do you feel that paul fe...

Questions